AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/170
1 Bait Balev Nesher, Department of Rehabilitation.
2 Bait Balev Nesher, Department of Rehabilitation.
3 Bait Balev Nesher, Department of Rehabilitation.
4 Bait Balev Nesher and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
*Corresponding Author: Jochanan E. Naschitz, Bait Balev Nesher and The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Citation: Zalyesov O., Badarny M., Zaygraykin N., Jochanan E. Naschitz (2021). Inpatient Rehabilitation after Hip Fracture: Predicting Success in Rehabilitation based on Preliminary FIM. J Clinical Research and Reports, 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/170
Copyright: © 2021 Jochanan E. Naschitz, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 May 2021 | Accepted: 13 May 2021 | Published: 21 May 2021
Keywords: hip fracture; rehabilitation; functional independence measure; FIM
Background: Predicting success of inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture is an unmet challenge
Objective: To assess whether a first impression Functional Independence Measure (FIM) before comprehensive evaluation may be useful to predict success in rehabilitation
Setting: Geriatric rehabilitation center.
Design: Retrospective observational study
Subjects: 42 consecutive elderly patients with proximal hip fracture.
Methods: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was assessed on the day of admission by a nurse (PreFIM), on day 3-5 by a multidisciplinary team (FimAdm) and on the day before discharge by the same multidisciplinary team (FIMDis). The potential of motor PreFIM to predict rehabilitation success, corresponding to motor FIMDis >58, was assessed, along with the length of stay in rehabilitation (LOS).
Results: The mean motor PreFIM was 43.3 (SD 11.4), motor FIMAdm 48.9 (SD 13.7), motor FIMDis 63.8 (SD 16.7), LOS 22.5 days (SD 9.7). Motor PreFIM predicted motor FIM discharge >58, the surrogate measure for success of rehabilitation, with 76.7% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. Motor PreFIM relation to LOS was statistically insignificant.
Conclusions: In a population of disabled elderlies, the motor PreFIM on admission-day was helpful to predict success in rehabilitation after hip fracture, but not the necessary duration of rehabilitation. Large prospective studies are needed to validate this data.
Numerous factors affect the outcomes of rehabilitation in patients with hip fractures, including age, sex, pre-fracture functional ability and frailty, cognitive status, affective status, patient motivation and preferences, comorbidity, the number of treatments, as well as family and social support [1-5]. It would be important for clinicians to predict success of rehabilitation better than clinical judgment alone. The aim of the present study was to find an instrument, which is generally available, quick and easy to use, and might enhance the clinician’s judgment in defining situations when rehabilitation is futile. The candidate was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) assessed on the admission-day by a nurse (PreFIM) before rehabilitation is started.
The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective observational study and waived the need for obtaining informed consent. The study was performed in a 40 bed rehabilitation department that admits mainly orthopedic patients. Included were consecutive patients aged 65 years or older transferred from orthopedic surgery to the geriatric rehabilitation ward. Excluded were non-cooperative subjects, as well as patients having an infected operation site, and those temporarily prohibited to tread. The following variables were appraised: demographic data, mini mental state examination of Folstein [6], social support [7], and functional independence measure [8].
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a tool used explore an individual's physical, psychological, and social functions and to monitor the progress under rehabilitation. The FIM has two subscales: the motor subscale, consisting of 13 items related to self-care, transfers, and locomotion, and the cognitive subscale, consisting of 5 items related to comprehension, expression, and memory. Each item is assigned a rating of 1–7, where 1 denotes the necessity for assistance and 7 denotes complete independence [8]. The preliminary FIM (PreFIM) was administered on the day of admission by a specifically initiated and experienced nurse before rehabilitation was begun. Admission FIM (FIMAdm) was provided by corroboration of a multidisciplinary teem 3-5 days after admission, having already qualified the patient's abilities over a few days of rehabilitation. FIM on the wake of discharge from rehabilitation (FIMDis) was provided by the same multidisciplinary team including physicians, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, speech and language therapists, dietitians, and nurses. The following variables were calculated: motor PreFIM, motor FIMAdm, motor FIMDis, motor FIMDis >58 indicating that usually a person may be discharged to the community [9], the absolute motor functional gain (i.e. motor FIMDis minus motor FIMAdm), the length of stay (LOS), and the motor PreFIM sensitivity and specificity in predicting motor FIMDis >58.
Rehabilitation involved the diagnosis of a person’s problems and needs, defining rehabilitation goals, and therapeutic interventions. Rehabilitation was provided by the multidisciplinary team consisting of physicians, occupational therapists, physical therapists, social workers, speech and language therapists, dietitians, and nurses. The patients received 5 days per week standard physical therapy (i.e., walking, climbing stairs, balance, muscle strength, and range of motion) and occupational therapy (i.e., basic ADL, instrumental ADL, and environment advice).
Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics, Student’s t test, Pearson’s correlation, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
The data of 47 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Five patients could not complete the rehabilitation because of intercurrent illness needing hospitalization and were excluded from the analysis. Patient demographics, FIM scores at different times, the LOS and ΔFIM/LOS are shown in Table 1.
Motor FIM changes from admission to discharge are shown in Figure 1.
Motor FIM Discharge >58 was found in 28 patients. The total FIM (motor and cognitive) improvement from admission to discharge was by 16.6 points (SD 9.9). The mean functional gain per day, i.e. total FIM at the time of discharge – total FIM on admission was of 0.8 points (SD 0.6). Prediction of rehabilitation outcome by motor Pre FIM, the sensitivity and specificity in relative to motor FIM Discharge >58, are shown in Figure 2.
According to cutoff motor PreFIM >41, 24 cases were true positive, 9 true true negative, 3 false positive and 6 false negative, accuracy 77%.
The correlation between motor PreFIM and the daily functional gain, i.e. progress in rehabilitation (Figure 3), was calculated according to the equation:
Daily motor functional gain = (motor FIM Discharge – motor FIM Admission)/LOS.
ROC curve analysis confronting LOS with FIM Discharge >41 was also insignificant statistically.
In this cohort of elderly patients assigned for inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture, the motor PreFIM assessed by a nurse on admission day, proved to have 77% accuracy in predicting rehabilitation success, the latter corresponding to motor FIM discharge >58.
The validity of FIM instrument for determining outcomes of rehabilitation has been in a study of 117.168 Medicare beneficiaries receiving inpatient rehabilitation for hip fracture in 2007-2009. A discharge motor FIM score of 58 yielded the best balance in sensitivity and specificity for classifying patients by discharge setting. FIM motor was equally effective as FIM total and more effective than FIM cognition in discriminating patients discharged to the community from those discharged to an institution. Moreover, FIM motor ratings alone were as effective as a multivariable model in discriminating patients discharged to the community from those discharged to an institution [9]. Indeed, from a clinical perspective, a diagnostic tool based on a single standard measure and a defined threshold of success is more practical and meaningful than values obtained from a composite model [9, 10]. This understanding was echoed in a survey of consultant members of the British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine [11].
Beyond commonsense used for the first triage, the preliminary FIM assessed by a nurse on admission-day was a valuable instrument to predict success in rehabilitation but not the pace of recovery. As shown in Figure 2, the motor PreFIM did not correlate with the daily motor functional gain. For the disadvantaged, a longer stay in rehabilitation compensated for slow improvement (Figure 3), also indicated by the lack of correlation between LOS and motor FIM discharge >41. Indeed, predicting success of inpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture is challenging because the outcome is affected by numerous factors in addition to treatment, including demographics, family and social support, patient motivation and preferences, which are beyond the control of rehabilitation facilities [12]. In practice, the use of one representative predictor of outcome, e.g. motor FIM discharge, is a necessary compromise.
Whether as simple a tool as the motor PreFIM can be an aid to predict when rehabilitation is futile remains to be answered by larger studies, combining the experience of different institutions in different populations. Data of the present study suggest that this might be possible.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
